Details for: APG 57514, Stylosanthes scabra Vogel, CIATFOR 10547

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Stylosanthes scabra Vogel

Top Name:

CIATFOR 10547

Origin:

Collected – Brazil

Maintained:

Australian Pastures Genebank

Received by APG:

01 Sep 1986

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Form Received:

Seed

Backup Location:

Svalbard Global Seed Vault

Availability

Form	Quantity	Note	Inventory	Cart
Seed	200 count		BASE 57514 2018wki2_____ SD

There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Stylosanthes scabra Vogel

Top Name:

CIATFOR 10547

Origin:

Collected – Brazil

Maintained:

Australian Pastures Genebank

Received by APG:

01 Sep 1986

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Form Received:

Seed

Source History

Collected

18 June 1983.
Locality: 21KM NW MORRO CHAPEU
Coll Source: Wild; Propagule: Seed; Rainfall: 710; Notes: Woodland Forest Margin

18 June 1983. Brazil
Coordinates: -11.4800, -41.3300 (Map it)
Elevation: 1000m.

Donated

01 September 1986. Brazil

Donator(s):

Schultze-Kraft, R. CIAT

01 July 2014. Australia

Donator(s):

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

08 September 2015. Australia

Donator(s):

Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Queensland

Accession Names and Identifiers

CIATFOR 10547

Type: Institute identifier

AusTRCF 110373

Type: Donor identifier

Group: AusTRCF

Austraian Tropical Forage

CPI 110373

Type: Institute identifier

Group: CPI

Commonwealth Plant Introduction

ALP 1.2

Type: Priority Score

Narrative

Group Note

Stylosanthes scabra Vogel

Genus:

Stylosanthes

Family:

Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)

Subfamily:

Faboideae

Tribe:

Dalbergieae

Nomen number:

35887

Place of publication:

Linnaea 12:69. 1838

Verified:

02/06/2015 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Common names

English
shrubby stylo –

Other conspecific taxa

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Heterotypic Synonym(s)

Stylosanthes nervosa J. F. Macbr.
Stylosanthes seabrana B. L. Maass & 't Mannetje
Stylosanthes suffruticosa Mohlenbr.
Stylosanthes tuberculata S. F. Blake

Annotations

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Study
GROWTH	Growth habit	Dominant growth habit	E - Erect (vertical dominant growth)(self-supporting)	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Perenniality	plant perenniality	STRONGLY PERENNIAL - Strongly Perennial	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
MORPHOLOGY	Spread Method	method by which accession spreads	SEED - Seed	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
MORPHOLOGY	First Flower, Prncpl Comp	Date of first inflorescence compared to principal comparator	L - More than 2 weeks after the principle comparator	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Leaf hairs	Leaf hairs	3 - Sparse hairs	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Stem hairs	Stem surface hairiness 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	2 - Pubescent (fine/soft hairs)	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Pod hairs	Pod surface hairiness 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	3 - Sparse hairs	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Stem colour - dominant	Dominant stem colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	Dark green	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Leaf colour (dominant)	Dominant leaf colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	Dark green	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Flower colour - dominant	Dominant flower colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	Yellow	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Flower colour - secondary	Secondary flower colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	Pale yellow	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	1000 Seed Weight	Weight of 1000 seeds in grams	3.33333	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Pod colour - primary	Dominant colour of mature pods 4-6 nodes from branch tip	Grey brown	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Mature seed colour pattern	Dominant seed colour pattern 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	1 - Uniform Colour	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Mature seed colour - dominant	Dominant seed colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	Fawn	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	10	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1990
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	105	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1990
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	15	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	20	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	20	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	20	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	30	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	30	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	30	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	30	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	35	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	40	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	40	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	5	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1990
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	50	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	50	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	60	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	60	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	70	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
OTHER	wet down date	Date seeds were first wetted for germination (in laboratory)	21/12/2017 12:00:00 AM	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PHENOLOGY	Days to First Flower	Days from wetting up to start of flowering phase	81	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PHENOLOGY	Minimum canopy height	Minimum canopy (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	5	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PHENOLOGY	Maximum canopy height	Maximum canopy (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	25	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PHENOLOGY	Minimum flower height	Minimum flower (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	5	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PHENOLOGY	Maximum flower height	Maximum flower (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	25	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PHENOLOGY	Anthracnose damage	Rating of anthracnose damage (Colletotrichum gloeosporoides)(May)	2 - Leafspots noticeable in upper canopy with some defoliation (< or = 25%)	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Brian Pastures Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	11	QLD Ballaroo, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	119	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	18	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	2	QLD Brian Pastures Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	2	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	25	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	26	QLD Rostock, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	3	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	3	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	3	QLD Narayen Research Station (EDYE), COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	3	QLD Narayen Research Station (EDYE), COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	4	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	5	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	6	QLD Ballaroo, COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	6	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	7	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	8	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Establishment Variation	variation in establishment ratings at different locations from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	1-Aug	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Persistence	persistence rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	8	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Rate Of Spread	assessment how accessions spreads from 1 (negligible) to 8 (like bad weed)	10	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Rate Of Spread	assessment how accessions spreads from 1 (negligible) to 8 (like bad weed)	2	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Palatability Green	rating on palatability of plants when green and actively growing from 1 (very low) to 8 (very palatable)	2	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Palatability Green	rating on palatability of plants when green and actively growing from 1 (very low) to 8 (very palatable)	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Palatability Green	rating on palatability of plants when green and actively growing from 1 (very low) to 8 (very palatable)	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Flowering and seed set	Estimate of seed production capacity	5 - Dense flowering, ready seed set (few empty florets)	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PRODUCTION	Trait Agronomic Value	Subjective rating (one to five ) based on the overall appearance of an accessions agronomic potential	2 - Poor	APG QLD Regen 2017-18 Stylosanthes
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	104	QLD Ballaroo, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	106	QLD Rostock, COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	121	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	121	QLD Narayen Research Station (EDYE), COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	1310	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	135	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	174	QLD Rostock, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	193	QLD Ballaroo, COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	207	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	256	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	317	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1995
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	3215	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	350	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	497	QLD Ballaroo, COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	524	QLD Narayen Research Station (EDYE), COPE project 1994
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	566	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	635	QLD Narayen Research Station (EDYE), COPE project 1993
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	773	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	841	QLD Holyrood, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	1	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	1	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	1	QLD Wolvi, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	1	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	2	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	3	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	4	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	4	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	4	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	4	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	4	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	5	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	5	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	5	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	5	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	5	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	6	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	6	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	6	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	6	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	6	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	6	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	7	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	7	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	7	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	8	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	8	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	9	QLD Wolvi, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 15	9	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2.25	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2.33	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2.33	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2.5	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2.5	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3.25	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3.6	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3.86	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3.91	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	4.5	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	4.67	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	5	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	6.33	QLD Wolvi, COPE project, sown 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	7	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	8	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1992
STRESS	Drought Tolerance	rating of drought tolerance from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	7	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED