Details for: APG 47025, Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth., RJW 5585

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth.

Top Name:

RJW 5585

Origin:

Collected – Brazil

Maintained:

Australian Pastures Genebank

Received by APG:

01 Jan 1966

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Form Received:

Seed

Backup Location:

Svalbard Global Seed Vault

Availability

Form	Quantity	Note	Inventory	Cart
Seed	200 count		BASE 47025 2017___2_____ SD

There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth.

Top Name:

RJW 5585

Origin:

Collected – Brazil

Maintained:

Australian Pastures Genebank

Received by APG:

01 Jan 1966

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Form Received:

Seed

Source History

Collected

03 August 1965.
Locality: 1st collection site nr Exp. Sta. at Pentecosta, Ce
Coll Source: Wild; Propagule: Seed; Soil Drainage: Seasonally Dry; Soil_Texture: Sandy Loam; Notes: Woodland Forest Margin

03 August 1965. Brazil
Coordinates: -3.8200, -39.3000 (Map it)

Collector(s):

Williams, Ron CSIRO Tropical Crops & Pastures

Donated

01 January 1966. Brazil

Donator(s):

Williams, Ron CSIRO Tropical Crops & Pastures

01 July 2014. Australia

Donator(s):

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

08 September 2015. Australia

Donator(s):

Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Queensland

Accession Names and Identifiers

RJW 5585

Type: Collector identifier

AusTRCF 40061

Type: Donor identifier

Group: AusTRCF

Austraian Tropical Forage

CPI 40061

Type: Institute identifier

Group: CPI

Commonwealth Plant Introduction

ALP 1.2

Type: Priority Score

Narrative

Group Note

Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth.

Genus:

Centrosema

Family:

Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)

Subfamily:

Faboideae

Tribe:

Phaseoleae

Subtribe:

Clitoriinae

Nomen number:

9844

Place of publication:

Comm. legum. gen. 54. 1837 (Ann. Wiener Mus. Naturgesch. 2:118. 1839)

Verified:

08/08/2011 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Common names

Other conspecific taxa

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Basionym

Clitoria brasiliana L.

Homotypic Synonym(s)

Bradburya brasiliana (L.) Kuntze

Annotations

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Study
GROWTH	Growth habit	Dominant growth habit	S - Dominant horizontal or decumbent growth (not self-supporting)	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
GROWTH	Twining capacity	Dominant twining capacity	T2 - Dominant vertical inter-branch twining (tight)	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	First Flower, Prncpl Comp	Date of first inflorescence compared to principal comparator	S - Within 2 weeks of the principle comparator	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	First flower, PGroup Comp	Date of first inflorescence compared to comparator for pasture group	S - First flowering within two weeks of group comparator	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Leaf hairs	Leaf surface hairiness 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	1 - Glabrous (none)	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Stem hairs	Stem surface hairiness 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	1 - Glabrous (none)	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Pod hairs	Pod surface hairiness 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	1 - Glabrous (none)	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Stem colour - dominant	Dominant stem colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	dark green	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Stem colour - secondary	Secondary stem colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	pink	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Leaf colour (dominant)	Dominant leaf colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (at 1st flower)	dark green	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Flower colour - dominant	Dominant flower colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	purple	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Mature seed colour pattern	Dominant flower colour pattern 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	1 - Uniform Colour	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Mature seed colour - dominant	Dominant seed colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	brown	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Mature seed colour - secondary	Secondary seed colour 4-6 nodes from branch tip (10-20 days after 1st flower)	Black	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	1000 Seed Weight	Weight of 1000 seeds in grams	14.2857	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Dominant leaf shape	Dominant leaf shape of fully expanded leaves (at 1st flower)	O1 - Ovate (no obvious lobes)	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	10	QLD Mutdapilly, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	12	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	15	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	15	QLD Mutdapilly, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	15	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	18	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	20	QLD Mutdapilly, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	20	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	25	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	30	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	30	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	40	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	50	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
MORPHOLOGY	Plant Dimensions	height (cm) and diameter (cm) of typical plant	40:60	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
MORPHOLOGY	Flowering	earliness to flowering	STERILE - Sterile, Never Flowered	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
OTHER	wet down date	Date seeds were first wetted for germination (in laboratory)	16/12/2016 12:00:00 AM	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PHENOLOGY	Days to First Flower	Days from wetting up to start of flowering phase	91	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PHENOLOGY	Minimum canopy height	Minimum canopy (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	5	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PHENOLOGY	Maximum canopy height	Maximum canopy (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	15	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PHENOLOGY	Minimum flower height	Minimum flower (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	5	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PHENOLOGY	Maximum flower height	Maximum flower (foliage) height (cm) (without support) (30-50 days after 1st flower)	15	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PHENOLOGY	Leafiness rating - principal	Estimate of leaf vs non-leaf material compared to principal (30-50 days after 1st flower)	2 - Similar to comparator	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PRODUCTION	Flowering and seed set	Estimate of seed production capacity	5 - Dense flowering, ready seed set (few empty florets)	APG QLD Regen 2016-17 Centrosema
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	1	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	1	QLD Wolvi, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	1	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	2	QLD Willunga, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	3	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	3	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	3	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	4	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	4	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	4	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	4	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	4	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	4	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	5	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	5	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	5	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	6	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	6	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	6	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	8	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	9	QLD Willunga, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	9	QLD Wolvi, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 18	9	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	0	QLD Narayen Research Station, COPE project 1979
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	1	NT Katherine Research Station, COPE project 1978
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	1	NT Katherine Research Station, COPE project 1979
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	1100	NT Berrimah Agricultural Research Centre (TB144), COPE project 1984
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	1700	NT Berrimah Agricultural Research Centre (TB144), COPE project 1984
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	2	NT Katherine Research Station, COPE project 1980
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	78	QLD Narayen Research Station, COPE project 1978
PRODUCTION	Seed Yield	Seed Yield	175	NT Katherine Research Station, COPE project 1978
PRODUCTION	Seed Yield	Seed Yield	42	NT Katherine Research Station, COPE project 1979
PRODUCTION	Seed Yield	Seed Yield	78	NT Katherine Research Station, COPE project 1980
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2.67	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1991
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	2.75	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3.67	QLD Brigalow Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3.67	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3.8	QLD Silkwood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	4	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	4	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1992
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	5.8	QLD Wolvi, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	6.67	QLD Willunga, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	1	QLD Brian Pastures Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Brian Pastures Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Calliope, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD South Johnstone Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	10	QLD Willunga, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	12	QLD Narayen Research Station, COPE project 1978
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	2	QLD Brian Pastures Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	2	QLD Narayen Research Station, COPE project 1978
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	2	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	3	QLD Southedge Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	5	QLD Brian Pastures Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	5	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	7	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	7	QLD Tedlands COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	8	QLD Brian Pastures Research Station, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	8	QLD Mutdapilly, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	8	QLD Willunga, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	9	QLD Holyrood, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	9	QLD Mutdapilly, COPE project, sown 1989
PRODUCTION	Establishment Variation	variation in establishment ratings at different locations from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	4-Aug	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Persistence	persistence rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	3	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Seed Production	rating for seed production from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	1	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED
PRODUCTION	Rate Of Spread	assessment how accessions spreads from 1 (negligible) to 8 (like bad weed)	1	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
PRODUCTION	Rate Of Spread	assessment how accessions spreads from 1 (negligible) to 8 (like bad weed)	3	QLD Silkwood, COPE project 1990
STRESS	Frost Tolerance	rating of plant frost tolerance from 1 (killed by light frost) to 8 (not killed by repeated serve radiation frosts)	3	TROPICAL.COLLECTOR.REPORTED