Details for: APG 48431, Desmanthus pernambucanus (L.) Thell., CIATFOR 8388

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Desmanthus pernambucanus (L.) Thell.

Top Name:

CIATFOR 8388

Origin:

Collected – Brazil

Maintained:

Australian Pastures Genebank

Received by APG:

01 Jul 1981

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Form Received:

Seed

Availability

Form	Quantity	Note	Inventory	Cart
Seed	200 count		ACTIVE 48431 1988___1_____ SD

There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Desmanthus pernambucanus (L.) Thell.

Top Name:

CIATFOR 8388

Origin:

Collected – Brazil

Maintained:

Australian Pastures Genebank

Received by APG:

01 Jul 1981

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Form Received:

Seed

Source History

Collected

Locality: 77KM. E. PATOS, PARAIBA
Coll Source: Wild; Propagule: Seed; Rainfall: 420

Brazil
Coordinates: -7.0700, -36.6700 (Map it)
Elevation: 580m.

Collector(s):

Schultze-Kraft, R. CIAT

Donated

01 July 1981. Brazil

Donator(s):

Schultze-Kraft, R. CIAT

01 July 2014. Australia

Donator(s):

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

08 September 2015. Australia

Donator(s):

Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Queensland

Accession Names and Identifiers

CIATFOR 8388

Type: Institute identifier

AusTRCF 92585

Type: Donor identifier

Group: AusTRCF

Austraian Tropical Forage

CPI 92585

Type: Institute identifier

Group: CPI

Commonwealth Plant Introduction

ALP 1.2

Type: Priority Score

Narrative

Group Note

Desmanthus pernambucanus (L.) Thell.

Genus:

Desmanthus

Family:

Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)

Subfamily:

Mimosoideae

Tribe:

Mimoseae

Nomen number:

419167

Place of publication:

Fl. adv. Montpellier 296. 1912 Jan (Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Math. Cherbourg 38(sér. 4, vol. 8):296. 1912)

Verified:

03/12/2004 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Common names

Other conspecific taxa

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Basionym

Mimosa pernambucana L.

Annotations

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Study
GROWTH	Vigour	Vigour	3	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2001
GROWTH	Vigour	Vigour	5	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2003
MORPHOLOGY	Height	Height	81	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	16	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	32	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	42	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Establishment	establishment rating from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	5	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Seed Production	rating for seed production from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	1	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Seed Production	rating for seed production from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent)	3	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Leafiness	rating for above-ground leafiness from 1 (no leaf) to 8 (extremely leafy)	5	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	1280	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	1470	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	218	QLD Broad Creek, COPE project 2000
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	2200	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	2311	QLD Condamine, COPE project 1999
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	2600	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	314	QLD Cinnabar, COPE project 2000
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	4100	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	6	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	6700	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield	Biomass Yield	810	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	10	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	3	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	4	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	4	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	6	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	6	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	7	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	8	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	9	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	9	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Biomass Yield Rating	The total dry weight of plant material produced per unit area, indicating overall rating 0 to 11	9	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Regeneration	Regeneration	5	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Regeneration	Regeneration	7	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Regeneration	Regeneration	8	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Regeneration	Regeneration	9	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Regeneration	Regeneration	9	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	3	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	4	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	6	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	8.5	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	9	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Summer Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	9.5	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Winter Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	4	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2001
PRODUCTION	Winter Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	6	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Winter Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	6	QLD Bindaroo, COPE project 2003
PRODUCTION	Winter Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	7	QLD Bidson, COPE project 2002
PRODUCTION	Winter Biomass Yield Rating	Visual rating of biomass production, where October to April = summer and May - September = winter	9	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002
STRESS	Frost Tolerance	rating of plant frost tolerance from 1 (killed by light frost) to 8 (not killed by repeated serve radiation frosts)	2	NSW Maneroo, COPE project 2002